In 2014 following the headlines which read that the bodies of almost 800 babies and children had been cast into a septic tank in a mother and baby home run by the Bon Secours sister in Tuam, Ireland, I wrote a series of blogposts.
My aim was not to spin the facts or deny any allegations of abuse, but simply to forensically attempt to uncover the true story of what had happened. It wasn’t that I didn’t believe that nuns could behave in such an appalling fashion, clearly they were capable of all sorts of heinous acts of cruelty and abuse, it’s just that the narrative of them wilfully starving, abusing or neglecting babies and children to death before cruelly dumping their bodies in a septic tank did not ring true. Gradually, a more nuanced and historically accurate picture began to emerge, though still undeniably tragic.
A story of young girls in poverty abandoned by society, in poor health, giving birth to sickly babies unable to withstand the rigours and deprivation of institutional life. A story of a children’s home in a poor state of repair, served by Tuam’s oldest doctor, desperately short of cash and resources, with the council and local population unwilling to put their hands in their pockets. A story of children subject to epidemics of measles, influenza and gastroenteritis in crowded conditions, a time before antibiotics as well as poor diet and perennial low temperatures. An analysis of the death certificates indicates that the causes of death were rarely from one single determining factor – a lot of the children had had underlying ill-health or conditions since birth and some had been born with abnormalities.
Gradually media outlets began to amend, correct and withdraw their stories, rowing back on some of the claims, and Spiked online (which is in no way a right-wing or Catholic publication) published this powerful analysis.
Today, the Commission on Mother and Baby Homes in Ireland, has released a statement saying that following some trial excavations of the site, significant numbers of human remains have been found.
“Test trenches were dug revealing two large structures. One structure appears to be a large sewage containment system or septic tank that had been decommissioned and filled with rubble and debris and then covered with top soil. The second structure is a long structure which is divided into 20 chambers.”
It has not been ascertained what the purpose of this structure is, it appears to be for the containment and treatment of sewage and water but it’s not been determined whether or not it was ever used for this purpose. 17 out of the 20 chambers appear to contain human remains, some of which were recovered for forensic tests. The remains are those of children aged between 35 weeks gestation and 2-3 years of age.
The commission is shocked and saddened and the remains will now be interred respectfully and appropriately, assuming that they were not in the first place.
As my blog posts garnered over 100,000 hits, I have taken a lot of flak, as it is perceived that I was one of the deniers. A second wave of hysteria and outrage about the babies at Tuam now appears to be sweeping Ireland, with many claiming vindication, which is a baffling sentiment. There ought to be nothing to celebrate over the discovery of several deceased infants.
I am prepared to stand by my original posts, because I did not deny the existence of remains on the property, nor that children had died of natural causes, I simply questioned the narrative of babies being deliberately and callously tossed like rubbish into a septic tank.
Interestingly in one post, I quoted a letter from Dr Finbar McCormick from the school of Geography, Archeology and Palaeoecology at Queen’s University, Belfast. Dr McCormick posited that the children could actually have been buried in a purpose-built burial shaft which were common, as was the practice of burying stillborn children or those who died shortly after birth, in a communal unmarked area inside the maternity hospital. The practice of returning infants back to the family for burial is a very recent tradition.
Anecdotally I know of a number of similar cases whereby children were put in the coffins of unrelated adults by funeral directors (which apparently was commonplace in some UK funeral directors until the ‘60s and in Ireland until the 1980’s), I’ve been talking to several women about miscarriage and stillbirth recently who have told heartbreaking stories of their stillborn children being removed from them straightaway and buried in an unknown place, and even in my own family, my father discovered only last year that he had an older brother who died at the age of two, who is buried in an unknown grave somewhere. There are mass children’s burial grounds throughout Ireland and plenty of mass graves from non-Catholic institutions, such as workhouses, in the UK.
So, the outrage about the unmarked mass grave, while understandable may be misplaced. They are not a historical anomaly and were at various points, the norm. It is not proof of an uncaring or un-Christian attitude and we do not know that the deceased were accorded absolutely no rites or respect.
Secondly, while the commission has noted that the structure containing the remains appeared to be a septic tank, it might not ever actually have been used as one, and they are not clear as to its purpose. I’m no engineer, but 20 chambers seems rather a large amount. Dr McCormick’s suggestion that the septic tank could be a burial vault and should be treated as such until proved otherwise, still seems to hold true. The commission have only said what the structure appears to be, but aren’t entirely sure, neither do they know if it was ever used.
In his blogpost which appears to row back from some of his original claims, journalist Philip Boucher-Hayes, quotes an eyewitness called Julia Devaney who was firstly a resident of the Tuam home and later an employee. She recalled assisting the sisters in carrying the bodies of deceased babies through a tunnel which led to a burial vault. A vault accessed by a tunnel, as Boucher-Hayes notes, could not be a septic tank. This vault was in the same place (Plot A) as another witness, Mary Moriarty had fallen into while playing, when the ground subsided. Moriarty says that she and her neighbours investigated further and discovered a large underground vault with shelves from floor to ceiling neatly stacked with about 100 swaddled infant bodies.
So as yet we have two structures found. One a septic tank with no human remains which was clearly decommissioned. The second consists of 20 chambers, at least 17 of which contain human remains, many of which are children under 2, dating from the ‘50s. Which tallies with the eyewitness account of a vault with shelves from walls to ceiling containing deceased infants, and could well be the vault which was accessible from a tunnel, which another witness recalls being in use in the 1950’s.
There is nothing then as yet to suggest that the remains of these children were maltreated or buried without the due accord and respect. It may not have been the way that we would wish for them to be buried today, but neither is this indicative of anything sinister.
Just as it is perfectly possible that these poor children were simply tossed into a septic tank (though I note that critics are now beginning to concede that the tank was disused and claim that it doesn’t matter whether or not it was filled with sewage), it’s also more than feasible that the vault was styled in a similar way to the catacombs. Placing bodies on shelves in a vault hardly seems like egregious disregard. Archive evidence demonstrates that the home did put in a tender for coffins, therefore it may only have been the infants who were buried tightly wrapped in swaddling. Again, not what we might wish for a child, but not necessarily indicative of anything nasty. And neither do we know whether or not some or all of the vault was consecrated, because it would surely need to be if older babies and children were interred there.
As the commission has noted, the news is not any great surprise – they had been excavating a known burial site.
Historian Catherine Corless deserves respect and vindication because her main aim has not been to propagate a sensationalist anti-Catholic narrative, but because she has always believed that bodies were buried on this site and that they ought to be properly accounted for and given the respect and memorial they deserve, not least because as she recollects from her own time at school with children of the home, they were often treated with contempt and disdain.
There may well be 798 bodies underneath the site, a fact that nobody has ever sought to deny, including the locals. Though this is far from established fact. There was a septic tank in use for the first 12 years of the home, during which period 206 children died. Where were their bodies placed if the second structure was in use servicing the first? Or was the second structure used right from the outset! How many is a ‘significant number’?
Is this definitive proof of evil-doing by a group of nuns who are unable to defend themselves or explain what their burial practices were? Justice is not best served by supposition and assumption and neither should these deceased children be politicised. Particularly not when those weaponising them, are using this to whip up hatred of the Catholic Church to use in the forthcoming referendum on Abortion. I wonder what many of those proudly displaying their ‘Repeal the Eighth’ avatar while venting their fury over the babies in the septic tank, would make of the incineration of aborted babies’ remains in hospital incinerators for energy?
11 thoughts on “Tuam Revisited”
There’s so much GOOD in Catherine Corless’s, selfless and exhaustive research into this tragedy, as opposed to the EVIL inherent in Caroline Farrow’s self-serving, apologist diatribe. I pray for caroline Farrow’s soul, truly I do!
Could you identify the evil please Gerard? Thanks for the prayers for my soul, though if you are Christian you’ll understand that we are specifically commanded not to judge other people’s souls, that is a task only for God, unless you are claiming His omniscience?
Caroline, there is nothing Good about you, you’re pure evil.
Which is ironically every bit as judgemental as you presume the nuns to be. Do you imagine that I am bothered by your insult? Or that I am going to re-think my life because some random person on the internet who has never met me has formed a judgement that I am evil. Despite the fact that this is precisely what Christians are explicitly warned not to do. Attempt to divine what’s in others hearts or souls. That is for God to judge.
I feel genuinely sorry for you that you would appear to be so full of anger and inadequacy that you want to verbally assault me in order to upset me. That’s neither nice or tolerant. You can’t critique what’s written so you launch in for a nasty personal attack which actually discredits you and makes you look irrational.
You are also a coward as I can see you have accessed my blog via VPN, so as not to be identified – I think you’ve been here before once or twice haven’t you ‘well’.
Seriously. Why behave like this? What do you achieve? It’s a sad and pathetic psyche which seeks to derive satisfaction from abusing others on the internet. My reaction will be giving you a little thrill won’t it. Poor darling.
And remember with what measure you judge, so too will you be judged.
It is interesting how the U.S. media are treating this as if it were an entirely new story. They seem to have forgotten that they reported on it three years ago. I assume that in Ireland it has been more in people’s mind during the interval and that they have not forgotten so easily.
In many ways Tuam is but a symptom of the antisexual terrorism which permeated the Ireland of the period. A close alliance between church and state gave us this lethal cocktail.
“antisexual terrorism”? The McAleese Report found not a single incident of sexual abuse by a nun in a Magdalene laundry. Not one. Also, the vast majority of its interviewees said they were never physically punished in the laundries. Not to mention all the women were there voluntarily. So-called “sexual liberation” has caused more violence than the church ever has. Or do the aborted children being used to heat the hospital not count?
I think iggy means the anti-sex feeling—the denial of sex and encouragement of a kind of neurotic chastity. Italians are Catholic too, but not like this.
Hi Caroline. I thought you might like to check out the New York Times Article on Tuam. It’s exhaustively researched and written. And I stand by my assertion above, that the tale of the two women ‘Catherine’ & Caroline’ is a metaphor for the ‘Good V Evil’ battle. Of course I don’t claim to be God, but I can opine, assert even, that your attempt to discredit the work of Catherine Corless comes from a place of deep darkness.
HI Gerard – thanks for the piece which is actually more romanticised storytelling rather than anything factual or historically evidence.
You can opine all your like, but as you say you are not God and the attempt to smear a bunch of long-dead sisters doing their best for the poorest in society, in order to suit your political ends and propagate hatred for the Catholic Church can only come from a place of deep deep darkness.
Perhaps you ought to examine your conscience about telling lies Gerard, otherwise retract the lie you have told about my attempt to discredit the work of Catherine Corless.
I do not dispute that there may be a mass grave, but what I do question and always have, is the mythologising of babies, infants and children deliberately maltreated and neglected and then tossed into a sewage pit.
You are obviously a disturbed individual, coming back to my blog months later to offer nothing but abuse, so I pray that you find peace, honesty and integrity. God Bless you Gerard.